Posted on Jan 19, 20139 notes#aaron swartz#transparency

An update on WCITLeaks.org

So far we have received and published four documents. That doesn’t sound like much, but they are very interesting ones. Eli and I are very happy with how our little project has turned out so far.

Thanks to all of you who have spread the word about WCITLeaks. The site was received positively in the Twitterverse, and we’ve garnered some press coverage, including these stories:

A couple of pointers: If you want to understand what the WCIT is really all about, the one piece you have to read is this post by Milton Mueller. It’s the best explanation of what’s at stake. And if you want to understand the International Telecommunication Union’s lack of transparency, check out this article by Patrick Ryan and Jacob Glick.

Posted on Jun 8, 2012#wcit#itu#un#wcitleaks#Transparency

Today we’re launching WCITLeaks.org

As you may have heard, the UN is trying to take over the internet. Well, that’s not really true, but member states of the UN’s International Telecommunications Union (ITU) are definitely going to negotiate an agreement related to the Internet at the World Conference on International Communications (WCIT - pronounced ‘wicket’) this December in Dubai. U.S. officials have warned that some member states, including Russia and China, have put forth proposals to regulate the Internet. Vint Cerf has warned that “Such proposals raise the prospect of policies that enable government controls but greatly diminish the ‘permissionless innovation’ that underlies extraordinary Internet-based economic growth to say nothing of trampling human rights.”

So what are these proposals? Well, we don’t know exactly. To see them, you have to have access to the ITU’s password protected website. This lack of transparency brings to mind secret negotiations like the one that gave us ACTA, and several civil society groups have written to the ITU demanding access to the documents.

The proposals are not classified and it’s not illegal to share them. In fact, they often are shared. At a recent panel discussion that I attended, the State Department’s Richard Beaird said, “Access to the proposals, of course, as I have done and others have done, is if you ask me, I will give you those proposals. I don’t want to have a flood of requests coming in from the room or those int he television audience.”

At the time, I tweeted: “If someone will pass them to me, I volunteer to host a site with gov WCIT proposals.” It seemed weird to me that someone wasn’t collecting and publishing the documents, like how opencrs.com does with Congressional Research Service reports. I promptly forgot about the idea, but was reminded yesterday when Milton Mueller wrote this post urging the U.S. to make documents available. He wrote:

Today, IGP has learned that the U.S. government is in possession of a document that brings together descriptions of all the WCIT proposals emerging from the ITU’s Council Working Group. The document, known as TD 64, compiles all the proposals on the table into a single document without attributing them to any specific government. No law or treaty stops the US government from making this document available to the public. We urge the U.S. government to release TD 64 of the ITU Council Working Group immediately.

Of course, while it’s not illegal, publishing these documents is probably not considered polite in the rarefied diplomatic circles of the ITU. So, I thought we’d give folks with access to the documents a helping hand.

Yesterday Eli Dourado and I spent a couple of hours putting together a website at WCITLeaks.org. The idea is simple: If you have a WCIT or ITU related document you’d like to share, submit it anonymously and we will publish it. That’s it. We hope you find it useful and that you’ll spread the word.

Posted on Jun 6, 20122 notes#un#itu#wcit#internet#Transparency
The Government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears. Nondisclosure should never be based on an effort to protect the personal interests of Government officials at the expense of those they are supposed to serve.

Barack Obama, Jan. 21, 2009

Posted on Dec 4, 201025 notes#quote#obama#wikileaks#transparency

Yours truly speaking at the Congressional Transparency Caucus launch event last week. I’m on at about minute 6.

Posted on May 3, 20101 note#video#media#transparency
Posted on Mar 23, 20101 note#media#transparency#stimulus#tufte

I was on NewsChannel 8’s “Federal News Tonight” talking about EarmarkData.org.

Posted on Mar 18, 20101 note#video#media#Transparency#Earmarks
Posted on Mar 15, 20101 note#link#earmarks#transparency
I have a chapter in the new O’Reilly book “Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice,” which you can get from Amazon. Abstract of my contribution:

 Jerry Brito calls on hackers—in the sense of brilliant programmers rather than computer criminals—to liberate government data for the masses. If the government won’t make data available and useful, it is up to technologists to do it for them.

Here’s a free 7-chapter sneak peek of the book (PDF), and here’s my chapter (PDF) titled “All Your Data Are Belong to Us: Liberating Government Data.” Check out the whole thing because there are some amazing folks in here who contributed some really remarkable pieces.

I have a chapter in the new O’Reilly book “Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice,” which you can get from Amazon. Abstract of my contribution:

Jerry Brito calls on hackers—in the sense of brilliant programmers rather than computer criminals—to liberate government data for the masses. If the government won’t make data available and useful, it is up to technologists to do it for them.

Here’s a free 7-chapter sneak peek of the book (PDF), and here’s my chapter (PDF) titled “All Your Data Are Belong to Us: Liberating Government Data.” Check out the whole thing because there are some amazing folks in here who contributed some really remarkable pieces.

Posted on Feb 17, 20102 notes#photo#meta#book#transparency

Jerry Brito - Watching the Stimulus

Me on the Cato Daily Podcast discussing Stimulus Watch 2.0.

Posted on Dec 9, 2009#media#audio#stimulus watch#transparency

Me on WAMU’s Kojo Nnamdi show talking about StimulusWatch.org.

If I sound like I don’t know what I’m talking about, it’s because I specifically told the producer I couldn’t address local stimulus projects, but could talk about the transparency and accountability effort nationally and, of course, the show was all about local impact.

Posted on Dec 7, 2009#audio#media#radio#transparency#stimulus
Posted on Dec 7, 2009#link#transparency#dc

Me on Federal News Radio discussing the new features available on Stimulus Watch 2.0. Check out our new advanced search!

Posted on Nov 25, 20091 note#audio#media#Transparency#stimulus watch

This is me on WUSA Channel 9 News last night talking about government transparency and the new StimulusWatch.org which went live today.

While the original site featured proposed stimulus projects taken from the U.S. Conference of Mayors survey, this new version contains actual stimulus spending in your neighborhood. We get our data from the official recipient reports available at Recovery.gov. We will update the data quarterly when Recovery.gov makes new data available.

You can search for contracts and grants awards by state and city, by awarding agency, or by recipient. (Keyword searching is coming soon.) When you find an award that interests you, you can vote on whether you are satisfied with it or not, add to the wiki description of the project, and join in the conversation about the award in the comments section.

Check it out, blog it, tweet it, and tell your friends!

Posted on Nov 18, 20094 notes#media#Transparency#video#stimulus watch
Posted on Nov 17, 20091 note#link#sfree#podcast#Transparency